The best gaming monitors with lowest input lag at 144hz 24

A 24-inch screen at 144Hz is the classic competitive setup, and input lag decides whether that speed reaches your eyes on time. The best gaming monitors with lowest input lag at 144hz 24 in this guide are seven real models with maker-listed 1 ms response times and an honest note on the figure makers rarely publish.

Quick verdict on the best gaming monitors with lowest input lag at 144hz 24

If you want the shortest path to a fast 24-inch setup, pick a TN panel with a maker-listed 1 ms GtG response time and a 144Hz refresh rate. The BenQ ZOWIE XL2411K leads this list for pure competitive play, thanks to its DyAc blur reduction and a stand built for long sessions at a desk.

For better color without giving up speed, the IPS models below are the smarter buy. The AOC 24G2 and MSI Optix G241 keep the same 144Hz refresh rate with wider viewing angles and richer color, while the Acer Nitro VG240Y P adds VRB strobing for clearer motion. The ASUS VG248QG lists the fastest GtG figure here at 0.5 ms, and the Dell S2421HGF adds a height-adjustable stand. No maker in this list publishes a millisecond input lag figure, so this guide ranks speed on refresh rate, response type, and panel behavior instead.

The ViewSonic XG2405 is the pick for mixed use, with the widest color coverage in the group, while the Dell S2421HGF suits buyers who want a height-adjustable stand and the brightest panel here. Whichever model you choose, connect it over DisplayPort when you can, and set the refresh rate to 144Hz in your display settings on day one.

Quick comparison table

Use this table to narrow the list before you read the detailed sections. It compares the panel type, resolution, and response time each maker publishes, plus the input lag figure status and the buyer each model fits best. All seven models are 24-inch class displays with Full HD resolution and a 144Hz refresh rate.

How we selected these monitors

Every model in this guide meets three hard limits drawn from the search itself: a 24-inch class screen, a 144Hz refresh rate, and a maker-listed response time of 1 ms or faster. We then favored models with a clear response type on the maker spec sheet, so you can tell a GtG figure from an MPRT or VRB figure instead of comparing unlike numbers.

We also kept the list honest about input lag. No maker in this group publishes a millisecond input lag figure, so no model here carries an invented lag number. The ranking instead weighs refresh rate, response type, panel technology, and the motion features each maker actually lists, such as DyAc, ELMB, VRB, and overdrive modes.

Overdrive settings deserve a note of their own, because the fastest mode is not always the cleanest. Dell publishes three GtG steps for the S2421HGF, which shows how the figure changes with the overdrive level, and the same trade applies to every model here. A middle overdrive setting usually gives the best balance of speed and clean motion, while the fastest setting can add inverse ghosting on high-contrast edges.

What input lag means at 144hz

Input lag is the delay between your graphics card sending a frame and that frame appearing on screen, and it is not the same as response time. Response time measures how fast pixels change color, while input lag covers signal processing, scaling, and the panel scan itself.

At 144Hz, each frame lasts about 6.9 ms, so processing delay matters more than it does at 60Hz. A display that adds a full frame of delay hands back much of the advantage the high refresh rate promises. That is why competitive players care about input lag separately from response time, and why this guide treats the two figures as different things.

What best gaming monitors with lowest input lag at 144hz 24 most likely means

The keyword for this guide ends at the number 24, which reads as a truncated search phrase, and the missing ending is unconfirmed. The most likely completion is 24 inch, since every model that fits the rest of the phrase is a 24-inch class display, and 24 inch is the standard size for this kind of competitive monitor search.

This guide therefore covers 24-inch class monitors, meaning 23.8-inch viewable panels sold as 24-inch models, all running at 144Hz. If the original search meant something else by the trailing number, that reading is not stated here, because the completion is unconfirmed and inventing it would mislead the comparison.

The seven monitors in detail

The seven monitors below all share a 24-inch class Full HD panel and a 144Hz refresh rate, but they split into two clear camps. Three TN models trade viewing angles for raw pixel speed, while four IPS models trade a strobed response figure for wider angles and better color.

Read each section for the response type behind the headline number, because a 1 ms GtG figure and a 1 ms MPRT figure describe different things. The notes on ports and sync support also matter, since some models reach 144Hz only over DisplayPort or a specific HDMI version.

Brightness and contrast also separate the list more than the headline numbers suggest. The Dell S2421HGF is the brightest model here at 350 cd per square meter, while most of the IPS models sit at 250, and every model in the group lists a 1000:1 contrast ratio. That means the Dell holds up best in a bright room, while the IPS models win on viewing angles and color rather than on raw brightness.

BenQ ZOWIE XL2411K, the esports TN pick

The BenQ ZOWIE XL2411K is the most competition-focused monitor in this guide, and its spec sheet reads like a tournament checklist. It pairs a 24-inch TN panel with Full HD resolution, a 144Hz refresh rate, and a maker-listed 1 ms GtG response time, plus DyAc blur reduction.

The TN panel is the trade-off you accept for that speed. Viewing angles are narrower than IPS, and color shifts when you look at the screen from the side, but the panel holds fast motion cleanly and the 320 cd per square meter brightness keeps the image readable in a bright room. The 1000:1 contrast ratio and 98 percent sRGB coverage are typical for a TN panel in this class.

Connectivity covers three HDMI ports plus DisplayPort 1.2, and BenQ states that 144Hz works over DisplayPort and HDMI 2.0. The monitor also supports 120Hz output for consoles, which suits players who split time between PC and console. FreeSync support is not the headline here, since the ZOWIE line targets players who run uncapped frame rates and value DyAc over variable refresh.

BenQ does not publish a millisecond input lag figure for the XL2411K, so this guide does not assign one. The case for low lag rests on the 144Hz refresh rate, the 1 ms GtG response time, and the TN panel, which has no wide-angle color processing to slow the image path. If your priority is competitive first-person shooters and you sit directly in front of the screen, this is the strongest pick in the list.

ASUS VG248QG, the fastest GtG figure here

The ASUS VG248QG lists the fastest GtG response time in this guide at 0.5 ms, and it is the only model here with a refresh rate above 144Hz. The 24-inch TN panel runs Full HD at 144Hz natively, with 165Hz available as an overclock over DisplayPort. That makes it a 144Hz monitor first and a 165Hz monitor second.

ASUS pairs the fast panel with Extreme Low Motion Blur, which strobes the backlight to cut motion blur further, plus Adaptive-Sync with FreeSync Premium and G-SYNC Compatible certification. The combination covers both AMD and NVIDIA graphics cards, so screen tearing stays under control across a wide range of frame rates. GamePlus and GameVisual add on-screen tools and preset display modes for different game genres.

The TN panel brings the usual limits: narrower viewing angles and less color richness than the IPS models in this guide. The 0.5 ms GtG figure is also a minimum based on ASUS internal testing, and response time varies with test conditions, so treat it as a best-case figure rather than an average across all pixel transitions. Even with that caveat, it is the quickest GtG number any maker lists in this group.

ASUS does not publish a millisecond input lag figure for the VG248QG, so none is stated here. The low-lag case rests on the 144Hz native refresh rate, the 0.5 ms GtG figure, and the ELMB option for motion clarity. It suits players who want the fastest TN numbers and a monitor that can stretch to 165Hz when the graphics card keeps up.

AOC 24G2, the proven IPS value pick

The AOC 24G2 has been a default recommendation for budget 144Hz IPS gaming for years, and its spec sheet explains why. The 23.8-inch IPS panel runs Full HD at 144Hz with FreeSync Premium, and AOC lists a 1 ms MPRT response time. The frameless design and 178-degree viewing angles keep it looking modern next to older TN rivals.

The response figure needs a careful read. AOC headlines 1 ms MPRT, which is a motion blur figure measured with backlight strobing, while some listings show a 4 ms figure as the GtG value for the same panel. The two numbers describe different measurements, so the honest statement is that the maker lists 1 ms MPRT and the GtG figure varies by listing. Either way, motion stays clean at 144Hz with the overdrive set to medium.

Color is the real reason to pick this model over a TN panel. The IPS panel holds color steady across wide angles, and the 250 cd per square meter brightness with a 1000:1 contrast ratio is standard for the class. Ports include two HDMI 1.4 inputs, one DisplayPort, and a VGA input on some variants, so older hardware still connects. Note that 144Hz needs DisplayPort here, since the HDMI 1.4 ports cap console and PC output at 120Hz.

AOC markets low input lag as a feature of the 24G2 but publishes no millisecond figure for it, so this guide states no lag number. The low-lag case rests on the 144Hz refresh rate, the MPRT strobing, and the IPS panel running at full speed over DisplayPort. It is the best fit for players who want IPS color and a long track record at a modest budget.

Acer Nitro VG240Y P, the IPS pick with VRB

The Acer Nitro VG240Y P brings IPS color to a 144Hz gaming monitor with a strobed response figure that needs its own explanation. The 23.8-inch IPS panel runs Full HD at 144Hz with AMD FreeSync, and Acer lists a 1 ms VRB response time. VRB stands for Visual Response Boost, the Acer strobe mode, so the 1 ms figure is an MPRT-type number.

That distinction matters in daily use. VRB must be switched on in the on-screen menu to reach the listed 1 ms figure, and the strobe mode cannot run at the same time as FreeSync, so you choose between blur reduction and variable refresh. With VRB off, the panel behaves like a standard IPS display with a slower GtG figure, which is normal for this panel class and still fine for most games at 144Hz.

The rest of the spec sheet is solid for the budget tier. Brightness is 250 cd per square meter, contrast is 1000:1, and the zero-frame design keeps bezels slim on three sides. Ports include two HDMI 2.0 inputs and one DisplayPort 1.2, which is a stronger HDMI setup than the HDMI 1.4 ports on several rivals here. Specialist coverage also notes a 165Hz overclock option, but Acer lists 144Hz as the standard refresh rate, so this guide treats 144Hz as the rated figure.

Acer does not publish a millisecond input lag figure for the VG240Y P, so none is stated here. The low-lag case rests on the 144Hz refresh rate, the VRB strobe mode for motion clarity, and the HDMI 2.0 ports that carry 144Hz without needing DisplayPort. It suits players who want IPS color, a slim frame, and flexible connections.

MSI Optix G241, the simple IPS esports pick

The MSI Optix G241 is the simplest IPS pick in this guide, with a short spec sheet and no feature that needs a footnote. The 23.8-inch IPS panel runs Full HD at 144Hz, and the MSI manual lists a 1 ms MPRT response time. FreeSync support matches the display refresh rate to the graphics card output for tear-free play.

The IPS panel gives this model the same core advantage as the other IPS picks here: wide 178-degree viewing angles and steady color from off-center seats. Brightness is 250 nits with a 1000:1 contrast ratio, which is standard for the class and bright enough for a normal room. The anti-glare coating cuts reflections without dulling the image, and the narrow bezel keeps the footprint tidy on a crowded desk.

Ports are straightforward, with one DisplayPort 1.2a and two HDMI 1.4b inputs plus an earphone output. Both DisplayPort and HDMI reach 144Hz at Full HD on this model, which is a small but real advantage over rivals whose HDMI 1.4 ports cap out at 120Hz. There is no USB hub and no height adjustment on the stand, so buyers who need those features should look at the Dell or the BenQ instead.

MSI does not publish a millisecond input lag figure for the Optix G241, so this guide states no lag number. The low-lag case rests on the 144Hz refresh rate, the 1 ms MPRT figure from the manual, and the IPS panel running at full speed over either digital input. It is the best fit for players who want a clean IPS setup with no overclocking and no extra modes to manage.

ViewSonic XG2405, the color-first IPS pick

The ViewSonic XG2405 leads with color coverage in a way the other IPS models here do not emphasize. The 23.8-inch IPS panel runs Full HD at 144Hz with AMD FreeSync, and ViewSonic lists a 1 ms response time. The panel covers 72 percent of the NTSC color space and 104 percent of sRGB, the widest color claim in this guide.

That color range makes the XG2405 the most versatile pick here for mixed use. It handles fast games at 144Hz and still shows photos and video with richer color than a TN panel or a narrow-gamut IPS panel. Brightness is 250 cd per square meter with a 1000:1 contrast ratio, matching the other IPS models, and the 178-degree viewing angles keep the image consistent for a second viewer or a shared desk.

The response figure follows the same pattern as the other IPS picks: the maker headlines 1 ms, and the figure is an MPRT-type number tied to motion blur reduction rather than a GtG pixel transition figure. Motion stays clean at 144Hz, and the FreeSync range of 47 to 144Hz covers the frame rates most budget graphics cards deliver at Full HD. Ports include two HDMI 1.4 inputs, one DisplayPort 1.2, and a 3.5 mm audio output.

ViewSonic does not publish a millisecond input lag figure for the XG2405, so none is stated here. The low-lag case rests on the 144Hz refresh rate, the 1 ms response figure, and the IPS panel with FreeSync support. It suits players who split time between games and color-sensitive work and want one screen for both.

Dell S2421HGF, the adjustable TN pick

The Dell S2421HGF is the most flexible TN monitor in this guide, and its manual is unusually clear about response time. The 23.8-inch TN panel runs Full HD at 144Hz, and Dell lists 1 ms gray to gray in Extreme mode, 2 ms in Super Fast, and 4 ms in Fast.

The stand is the other reason to pick this model. It adjusts in height by up to 100 mm and tilts from minus 5 to 21 degrees, which is more range than the tilt-only stands on several rivals here. Brightness is 350 cd per square meter, the highest in this guide, and the 1000:1 contrast ratio matches the TN class. FreeSync Premium and G-SYNC Compatible certification cover both AMD and NVIDIA cards.

Ports include two HDMI 1.4 inputs, one DisplayPort 1.2, and a headphone output jack. The vertical scan range runs from 48 to 144Hz, so variable refresh works across the full frame-rate band most budget cards deliver. The TN panel keeps viewing angles narrow at 170 degrees horizontal and 160 degrees vertical, so color shifts at an angle, but the panel stays fast and bright head-on.

Dell does not publish a millisecond input lag figure for the S2421HGF, so this guide states no lag number. The low-lag case rests on the 144Hz refresh rate, the 1 ms GtG figure in Extreme mode, and the clear overdrive scale that lets you trade a little speed for cleaner motion. It suits players who want a TN panel with a proper adjustable stand and the brightest screen in this list.

Buying guide for low input lag at 144hz

Start with the connection, because the wrong cable can cost you the refresh rate you paid for. Use DisplayPort whenever the monitor offers it, and read the maker spec sheet for the HDMI version before you assume HDMI reaches 144Hz. Several models here cap HDMI 1.4 at 120Hz.

Next, read the response figure by type instead of comparing bare numbers. A 1 ms GtG figure and a 1 ms MPRT figure measure different things, and a strobed figure only applies when the blur reduction mode is switched on. GtG figures compare directly with other GtG figures, while MPRT and VRB figures describe motion clarity with strobing active.

Panel type then decides the trade you live with every day. TN panels give the fastest GtG figures and the least processing overhead, but they narrow the viewing angles and flatten color. IPS panels give wider angles and richer color, but their headline 1 ms figures usually come from strobing rather than raw pixel speed. Neither panel type publishes a millisecond input lag figure in this group, so judge lag by refresh rate, response type, and the absence of heavy image processing.

Finally, set the monitor up for speed once it arrives. Turn on the overdrive or response time setting the maker recommends, switch on FreeSync or G-SYNC Compatible mode if your graphics card supports it, and keep the refresh rate at 144Hz in your operating system display settings. A monitor left at 60Hz after unboxing gives up the entire advantage this guide is about, no matter which model you bought.

Budget matters too, but it should not decide the panel type for you. All seven models sit in the same affordable tier for 144Hz gaming, so the real choice is between TN speed and IPS color, not between a fast monitor and a slow one. Spend the difference, if any, on a DisplayPort cable and a stand that holds the screen at eye level, since those two items affect daily comfort more than a small spec gap.

Frequently asked questions

These four questions cover the points buyers ask most about input lag, panel types, and connections. Each answer uses only the maker figures in this guide, so nothing here rests on an invented lag number or an unpublished benchmark. Read them before you settle on a panel type.

Does a 1 ms response time mean low input lag

No, a 1 ms response time does not guarantee low input lag, because the two figures measure different parts of the display pipeline. Response time tracks how fast pixels change color, while input lag adds signal processing, scaling, and the panel scan. A monitor can list 1 ms and still add a full frame of processing delay.

What matters for lag is the refresh rate, the processing path, and whether the maker publishes a lag figure at all. At 144Hz, each frame lasts about 6.9 ms, so a display with minimal processing keeps more of the refresh advantage. No maker in this guide publishes a millisecond input lag figure, so compare the models on refresh rate and response type instead.

Is a TN panel faster than IPS for input lag

A TN panel is usually faster on raw pixel response, and most TN models here list a 1 ms GtG figure without strobing. IPS models list their 1 ms figures as MPRT or VRB numbers, which need a strobe mode to apply. That gap is real, but it is smaller than the headline numbers suggest, since both panel types run at 144Hz.

For input lag specifically, neither panel type has a published millisecond figure in this group, so there is no maker data to rank them on lag alone. Choose TN if you want the fastest GtG number and sit straight in front of the screen, and choose IPS if you want wider viewing angles and better color at the same refresh rate.

Do I need DisplayPort to reach 144hz

It depends on the model, and the HDMI version decides the answer. Several monitors here reach 144Hz over DisplayPort but cap HDMI 1.4 at 120Hz, while models with HDMI 2.0 ports reach 144Hz over HDMI as well. The AOC 24G2 and ViewSonic XG2405 need DisplayPort for full speed, while the Acer VG240Y P reaches 144Hz over either input.

Read the maker spec sheet for your exact model before you buy a cable, and set the refresh rate to 144Hz in your display settings after connecting. A monitor connected over the wrong port or left at 60Hz runs slower than its headline figure, whatever the box promises.

Should I use the motion blur reduction mode

Modes such as DyAc, ELMB, and VRB strobe the backlight to sharpen fast motion, and they help most in fast first-person shooters. The trade is lower brightness and, on most models here, the loss of variable refresh while strobing is active. You cannot run blur reduction and FreeSync at the same time on the Acer and ASUS models in this guide.

Try the mode for a few matches and compare it against standard overdrive with FreeSync switched on. If the strobing looks flickery or the screen looks too dim, switch it off and use the fastest overdrive setting instead. There is no wrong answer here, only the setting that looks best to your eyes in your games.

Conclusion

Seven real 24-inch 144Hz monitors fit this search, and the honest split is simple: TN models give the fastest GtG figures, while IPS models give better color with strobed 1 ms figures. No maker here publishes a millisecond input lag figure, so rank them on refresh rate, response type, and panel behavior.